作 者: ;
机构地区: 佛山科学技术学院政法学院
出 处: 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第1期137-140,160,共4页
摘 要: 证明妨碍是民事诉讼中违背诚实信用原则的行为。为防止其害,许多国家对其加以规范,在民事诉讼法中规定证明妨碍制度。我国民事诉讼法有关证明妨碍制度的规定甚为粗浅,无法满足现实需要。诉讼之实质公正要求、证明妨碍当事人的证据保全义务、维护诉讼程序的应然需要是证明妨碍制度之正当性基础,完善我国证明妨碍制度则应在确立证明妨碍制度的目标体系和确立证据提出义务的基础上,按照公正原则分层设立制裁措施,并设立妨碍人亡救济措施。 Proof obstruction is the common phenomenon in civil litigation.It violates the principle of sincerity.To punish the behavior of obstruction,foreign civil procedures set the system of proof obstruction.Though the civil procedure sets the system in our country,it is so superficial that it can not cope with the complicated phenomenon of proof obstruction.Through comparing with foreign legislations,this article analyzed the constitutional condition and foundation of proof obstruction,the aims for the system of proof obstruction,and the punitive pattern of it.On the basis of the comparison,the article also analyzed the problem of the legislation in our country,and put forward some ideas to perfect the system.
领 域: [政治法律—诉讼法学] [政治法律—法学]