作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学

出　　处： 《外语艺术教育研究》 2006年第2期66-70,27,共6页

摘　　要： 本文对比以乔姆斯基为代表的形式主义学派和以韩礼德为代表的功能主义学派在语言学研究中所依赖的语言事实方面的区别,通过语料库语言学的最新研究成果说明真实、自然的语料对语言学研究的重要性。 This paper attempts to probe into the relationship between linguistic research and linguistic evidence. A comparison is made between two major traditions in language research in terms of their use of linguistic evidence. Different from the mainstream Chomskyan approach, which argues that linguistics is a branch of cognitive psychology and that the description that is of greatest psychological relevance is the account of competence, not that of performance, an alternative tradition, represented by Halliday, regards the text as the object of linguistics along with the system. Examples from recent corpus research are cited to show the importance of authentic data to a more accurate description of language.

关 键 词： 语言研究 语言事实

领　　域： [语言文字—语言学]