作　　者： ;

机构地区： 深圳大学法学院

出　　处： 《政法论丛》 2017年第1期22-29,共8页

摘　　要： 随着互联网的飞速发展,P2P融资逐渐成为我国金融市场中不可忽视的一种融资模式。在目前作为主流的P2P融资模式"担保模式"和"混合模式"下,P2P融资担保行为在很大程度上决定着P2P融资面临着怎样的刑法风险。鉴于此,有必要对P2P融资担保行为进行刑法规范学意义上的分析。实践中常见的P2P融资担保行为,或在"担保模式"下,以直接正犯的形式出现;或在"混合模式"下作为共同正犯出现。同时,应区分那些并未侵害金融交易秩序这一法益,对正犯之实行行为并无重要影响,并缺乏帮助故意的中立的P2P融资担保帮助行为,将其排除在刑法规制之外。 P2P lending is currently a mainstream way of financing in the Chinese market, which consists of two models that involves in guarantee as to capitals and interests： the ＂guarantee providing model＂ and the ＂mixed model＂. Providing the guarantee in the P2P lending, to a large extent, is a decisive reason for its risk of being crim- inalized. Thus, analyzing the guarantee in the context of criminal law is necessary for understanding offences with re- gards to P2P lending. In practice, behaviors of providing the guarantee are always appearing as the behaviors of the joint principal offenders. Also, it has been possibly considered the adding and abetting behaviors that shall not be criminalized.

关 键 词： 融资担保 正犯 共同正犯 帮助犯

领　　域： [政治法律—民商法学] [政治法律—法学]