作　　者： ; (明莹）;

机构地区： 中国刑警学院

出　　处： 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2012年第2期35-40,共6页

摘　　要： 由于理论上认为不真正不作为犯和过失犯属于开放的构成要件,加之我国刑法理论对犯罪认定没有顺序性的考察方式,因此,司法实践中在遇到过失不真正不作为犯时认定负担过重。表现在实践中,有时只认定过失犯,有时只认定不真正不作为犯。为了解决此问题,可以将过失犯和不真正不作为犯的构成要件进行同类合并,如将作为义务和客观的注意义务合并,客观作为能力与客观注意能力合并等,以图建立统一的过失不真正不作为犯的犯罪构成体系,减轻司法认定的负担。 Because non-typical omission and negligent crimes are taken as open crimes constitution in theory and the theory on crime law lacks process assessment, the judicial court sometimes gives too much penalty when encountering non-typical omission and negligent crimes. In practice, sometimes only negligent crimes are considered, or sometimes only non-typical omissions are considers. To solve the problem, this paper combines negligent crimes with non-typical omission crimes, for example, the combination of obligation of action with care or objective action liability with care liability, in order to set up a unified crime constitution system of negligent non-typical omission crimes, and reduce the burden for judicial judgment.

关 键 词： 不真正不作为犯 过失犯 作为义务 注意义务

领　　域： [政治法律—刑法学] [政治法律—法学]