作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 华南理工大学

出　　处： 《政法论坛》 2006年第1期106-115,共10页

摘　　要： 民事诉讼《证据规定》第64条第一次以司法解释的形式,明确规定了法官在没有法律规定,或者法律规定不明的情况下,运用日常生活经验进行自主判断的权力,为法官的“无法”司法提供了制度依据。而法官的自由裁量离不开司法经验,广义的司法经验是泛指司法实践活动中逐渐形成和积累的关于法、法律和案件纠纷处理方面的知识和技能,是整个司法实践活动中形成的司法职业共识。狭义的司法经验则仅指法官个人在司法实践活动中的心得和体会,以及逐渐积累的知识和技能。在成文法背景下,司法经验的功能主要体现在法官的事实审理过程,具体地讲,司法经验在司法认知、事实推定、法律和证据选择、证据判断和证据采信等方面具有重要作用。因此,应当重视司法经验,并且在司法实践中合理利用司法经验;同时为防止司法自由裁量权的滥用,将司法经验的使用限制在合理的制度允许的范围内。 Article 64 of Rule of Evidence in criminal proceedings first, in the form of judicial explanation, expressly prescribes that judges, in the situation of having no legal provisions, or no express legal provisions, have the power to use their common knowledge to make judgment. This provides the systematic basis for judges＇＂ no law＂ justice. Judges＇ discretion cannot be made without judicial experience. The judicial experience in broad sense refers to the knowledge and skills gradually collected in judicial practice about laws and dispute settling, and the judicial professional common sense in the whole judicial activities. The judicial experience in narrow sense only means a judge＇s self understanding and experience and the knowledge and skills collected in judicial practice. In the context of statute, the function of judicial experience is mainly embodied in the process of hearing facts. Concretely speaking, judicial experience is of great importance in the following aspects such as judicial cognition, fact determination, law and evidence choice, evidence determination and evidence adoption. Therefore, judicial experience should be emphasized and effectively used in judicial pracrice. At the same time, in order to prevent the abusing of judicial discretion, the use of judicial experience shall be limited within the scope of reasonable system.

关 键 词： 司法经验 自由裁量权 内在特质 无法司法

领　　域： [政治法律—诉讼法学] [政治法律—法学]