作　　者： ;

机构地区： 香港中文大学

出　　处： 《交大法学》 2020年第4期34-52,共19页

摘　　要： 我国《反不正当竞争法》主导下的商业秘密保护模式对商业秘密的认定遵循“不为公众所知悉”“具有商业价值”以及“权利人采取保密措施”三个要件,而作为商业秘密法起源地的普通法系对商业秘密的保护大部分是通过违反信赖关系(breach of confidence)之诉实现的。与我国的商业秘密保护体系相比,违反信赖关系之诉的保护客体范围更广、对保密义务的认定更依赖司法实践且注重诚实信用原则。同时,为了在保护商业秘密和维持市场公平竞争的不同政策目的间维持平衡,普通法系对竞业禁止协议的适用做出了更严格的限制。本文以英国及我国香港特别行政区关于机密信息与商业秘密的司法实践为基础,探索其为完善我国商业秘密保护体系可能提供的借鉴。 Trade secrets under the Anti-unfair Competition Law in China refer to“technical information,business operation information,and other commercial information that are not known to the public,have commercial value,and for which the trade secret owner has adopted corresponding measures to maintain its confidentiality”.By contrast,confidential information in many common law jurisdictions is protected through the equitable action for breach of confidence.Compared with trade secret protection in China,breach of confidence protects a wider range of confidential information and it relies more on the function of the judiciary via the doctrine of good faith.To balance the policy goals of trade secret protection and fair competition,the common law approach imposes more restrictions on no-compete agreements.This article uses the case law in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as examples to illustrate the possibility of enhancing trade secret protection in China's Mainland.

关 键 词： 商业秘密 机密信息 信赖关系 保密义务 竞业禁止

领　　域： [政治法律—经济法学] [政治法律—法学]