作　　者： ;

机构地区： 西南政法大学

出　　处： 《中国法学》 2019年第2期279-302,共24页

摘　　要： 基于当事人主义的法理、尊重程序主体性的需要与保持法院中立性之要求,法院的审理对象和范围应该与当事人的诉讼请求保持一致,既不能超判,也不应漏判。当事人的诉讼请求、诉讼理由与法院的认定不一致时,我国民事诉讼法及司法解释要求法院告知当事人可以变更诉讼请求,但对法院未告知、当事人不变更的处置尚缺乏明确的规范。当前司法实践中存在三种优劣互见的处理方式。回归民事诉讼公正、有效率地解决纠纷的目的,尤其是扩大一审解纷机能之需要,遵循民事诉判关系的基本法理,从健全与完善诉讼请求的合并规则并辅以法院的释明两个方面来合理构建民事诉判关系的规则体系。 Based on the legal principle of adversarial system,the need to respect the subjectivity of the procedure and the requirement to maintain the neutrality of the court,the object and scope of the court should be consistent with the claim of the parties.The claim should not be exceeded or omitted.When the parties'claims and reasons for litigation are inconsistent with the court s determination,the Civil Procedure Law of China and its judicial interpretation require the court to inform the parties that they can change the claim.But there is still no clear regulation on the disposal that the court fails to inform and the parties do not change.There are three ways with both advantages and disadvantages in the current judicial practice.Returning to the purpose of fair and efficient settlement of disputes in the civil litigation,especially for the need to expand the function of first instance,and following the basic legal principle,it needs to rationally construct a system of rules for civil lawsuit and judgment relations from the improvement of combining rules of claims and the elucidatory right of the court.

关 键 词： 诉讼请求 法律关系 释明 诉判关系

领　　域： [政治法律—诉讼法学] [政治法律—法学]