作　　者： ;

机构地区： 浙江工业大学人文学院中文系

出　　处： 《浙江社会科学》 2015年第4期130-135,160,共6页

摘　　要： 在比较文学理论建设中,差异性研究范式与同一性研究范式是水火不容的,差异性是异质性的基础主义和同一性的普遍主义在认识论进程上的理论扬弃。因此从知识学上梳理比较文学的内在动因,并在现象描述模式上保持客观描述精神,坚决拒绝非逻辑建构的主观描述行为,就成为比较文学的逻辑出发点。中国当代比较文学,特别是叶维廉的文化寻根理论和曹顺庆的跨文明变异学理论,把差异性研究范式牢固地建构到比较文学理论和实践中,将被同一性研究范式掩盖的比较文学的对象即比较文学比什么和不比什么的问题陆续揭示。本文运用分析哲学的基本方法,对比较文学的命名、用名和辨名做了历史回顾,指出当代比较文学的主流已经摒弃了同一性研究范式而转向差异性研究范式,明确分辨出比较文学应该比什么和不比什么,并在此基础上对比较文学的性质、对象、功能等学科基础理论进行了系统重构。 In the theory construction of comparative literature,difference study of comparative literature is totally different from identity study,difference is the sublation of both the fundamentalism of heterology and the generality of identity in epistemology. Therefore,the first procedure for comparative literature study is to trace back to its inner motivation by way of objective and logical descriptions. Chinese comparative literature,including William Yip's cultural root-seeking theory and Cao Shunqing's trans- cultural variation theory,applies the paradigm of difference into studies,and then proclaims the object of comparative literature,that is,what to compare and what not to compare. This paper uses analytical philosophy to make a historical description of the nomenclature,the usage,and the analysis of comparative literature studies,points out the mainstream of contemporary comparative literature changes from identity study to difference study,clarifies what to compare and what not to compare,so as to reconstruct its framework of quality,object and function as well.

关 键 词： 比较文学 分析哲学 同一性 差异性

领　　域： [文学—文学理论]