作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学法学院

出　　处： 《怀化学院学报》 2021年第2期74-78,共5页

摘　　要： 实务中专利的“清楚、完整”要求具体标准不明确,并且在专利审查中被不当使用,在法院判决中的适用标准也不一致。可以尝试从“捐献原则”的角度来充实“清楚、完整”要求的法律内涵,“清楚、完整”要求可以表述为:申请人清楚、完整地表达技术方案以向公众捐献技术情报,作为回报,申请人才有可能要求获得公众对技术信息相应的排他权利的保护。通过对不同领域的相关捐献原则的具体司法案例进行总结,可以得到更加具体的、内容丰富的“清楚、完整”要求的标准。 The specific standards of the“clearness and completeness”requirement are not clear,the requirement is improperly used in patent examination,and the requirement standards are not consistent in the court.From the perspective of“donation rules”,to enrich the legal connotations,the“clear and complete”requirement can be expressed as follows:The applicant/patentee expresses the technical content clearly and completely for the purpose of donating technical information to the public,and in return,the applicant/patentee may request public support to the protection of exclusive rights corresponding to technical information.By summarizing the relevant judgments on the donation rule in different technical fields,relatively specific and rich“clear and complete”standards can be established.

关 键 词： 清楚 完整 捐献原则 充分公开 专利审查

领　　域： [政治法律—民商法学] [政治法律—法学]