作　　者： ;

机构地区： 浙江工业大学外国语学院

出　　处： 《外国语文》 2015年第4期40-46,共7页

摘　　要： 在管辖约束理论的框架下,格被分为结构格和内在格,它们在指派方式上有很大差异。在最简方案中,这一区别被继承下来。最简方案主张,结构格是不可解特征,需要核查;内在格是可解的,无须核查。本研究认为,在最简方案中,区分结构格和内在格的基础已不存在,因此,它们应该被统一处理。它们都可以被看作是不可解释的特征,都需要核查。这种设想不但具有理论优势,而且还有事实支撑,同时,还为汉语外部领有关系的探讨铺平了道路。 Within the framework of the Government and Binding Theory, Case is classified into structural Case and inherent Case. This distinction is adopted by the Minimalist Program, which holds that structural Case is uninterpretable and needs checking, and inherent Case, being interpretable, does not need checking. This paper proposes that the distinction between structural Case and inherent Case has lost its basis under the framework of Minimal Program. Therefore, structural Case and inherent Case should be treated in a unified way. That is, both of them need checking. Such a proposal is theoretically superior and empirically supported. In addition, it paves the way for the study of Chinese external possession.

关 键 词： 内在格 结构格 不可解特征 特征核查

领　　域： [语言文字—语言学]