作　　者： ;

机构地区： 深圳大学法学院

出　　处： 《地方立法研究》 2019年第1期26-34,共9页

摘　　要： 近年来,从中央到地方都有不断强化知识产权保护强度的趋势,知识产权保护的立法或政策目标被定位为"严格保护""更加严格保护",乃至"最严格保护",等等。《深圳经济特区知识产权保护条例》的立法目标,则经历了从"最严格保护"调整为"严格保护"的过程。该特区条例立法目标的调整,既是对中国仍是发展中国家和技术后发国家之现状的回应,也体现了知识产权法律制度必须在"激励"和"接触"之间进行平衡的制度需要,并契合经济学界所主张的知识产权"最优保护"的理论见解。当前,特区立法需要反思知识产权立法决策机制的特点及其局限性,矫正知识产权过度保护的立法冲动,在关注知识产权私法保护路径的同时,尤其要重视知识产权的社会科学研究进展并引入对知识产权保护水平的宏观思考。 In recent years,there has been a trend from the central government to the local governments to continuously strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights.The legislative or policy goal of intellectual property protection has been defined as “strict protection”,“tougher protection” and even “the strictest protection” and so on.In the legislative process of “Regulations on Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone”,the legislative goal has been changed from“the strictest protection” to “strict protection”[DK].It is suggested that such an adjustment of the legislative goals not only responds to the current situation that China is a developing country with less-developed technologies,but also reflects a balance between protecting the incentive for innovation and the possibility for public access.It conforms to the theory of “optimal protection” of intellectual property advocated by economists.At present,in the legislation of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone,it is necessary to reflect on the characteristics and limitations of the decision-making mechanism of intellectual property legislation,control the impulsion to over protect intellectual property rights,pay attention to the path of private law protection of intellectual property rights,attach importance to social science research on intellectual property rights and introduce macro thinking on the level of intellectual property protection.

关 键 词： 知识产权 最严格保护 最优保护 利益平衡

领　　域： [政治法律—法学]