作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学法学院知识产权学院、中英国际海事法学院

出　　处： 《北方法学》 2008年第1期66-71,共6页

摘　　要： 《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》对合同效力问题采取了"知难而退"的回避态度,因此当出卖人违反瑕疵担保义务之际如何判定合同的效力便成为一个重大而棘手的问题。分析表明,如果在确定所有权归属时侧重于保护善意买受人,而在合同法中却认定善意买受人所订立的买卖合同无效或效力待定,这势必使法律的保护重心动不定,由此导致法律适用的困难。鉴于世界各国对保护善意第三人的立场基本一致,建议公约明确规定在出卖人违反权利瑕疵担保义务而买受人为善意时,买卖合同为有效合同。 Since CISG(United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods)has adopted a relinquished stance to avoid dealing with issues of contract effect,it leaves a tough problem as to determining the contract effect on the seller's violation of warranty against defects of title.It is analyzed that in determining the title of goods,a preference is often given to protect the rights of the buyer's in good faith,while,such contract entered hereto should be held void or voidable in accordance with the contract law.Definitely,the priority of protection is shakable and problems arise in application of law.Considering the common stance taken by many states in protecting the third party in good faith,it is suggested that CISG should regulate explicitly that the sales contract is valid on seller's obligation violation of warranty against defects of title while the buyer in good faith.

关 键 词： 国际货物买卖 权利瑕疵 合同效力

领　　域： [政治法律—国际法学] [政治法律—法学]