作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学法学院

出　　处： 《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2015年第4期160-173,共14页

摘　　要： 要求特定主体履行特定行为是债权的内容,缺乏估量债权具体价值的标准,则债权难以成为数额犯的行为对象。处分行为是交付型财产犯罪构成要件要素,而非夺取型财产犯罪所必须。行为人为不履行债务杀害债权人的行为应当定性为抢劫罪;捡拾银行卡并在机器上取款、消费的行为是对他人债权利益的侵害,符合信用卡诈骗罪的犯罪构成。盗窃记名债权凭证,支取债权凭证所记载的财物的行为,成立诈骗型财产犯罪。盗窃债权凭证虽未支取,但造成失主无法挽回损失,可成立盗窃罪,不可一概作为故意毁坏财物罪处理。消极债权侵害行为(故意不履行债务、迟延履行债务的行为)能否认定为犯罪,应当根据行为人主观意志的明确程度、欠款金额、欠款性质以及行为的社会危害程度进行认定。无钱食宿的情形可认定为合同诈骗罪,而不宜一概做非犯罪化处理。 The creditor has the rights of asking a specific subject to perform a specific behavior Without a standard of estimating the specific value of the creditor＇ s rights, they cannot become the target of behavior for the crime of amount. Disposition behavior is the element of property crimes of delivery type rather than a must for property crime of the seizing type. The behavior of killing the creditor for refusing to pay off debts should be regarded as robbery; the behavior of picking up a bank card and then withdrawing money illegally for consumption is an infringement on another person＇ s benefits and should be considered the fraud of credit card. The act of stealing a registered claim voucher and taking away the recorded properties is a fraud of properties. The list can go on and we should make regu- lations for the crimes concerned.

关 键 词： 债权 信用卡诈骗 记名债权凭证 无钱食宿 合同诈骗

领　　域： [政治法律—刑法学] [政治法律—法学]