作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广州海事法院

出　　处： 《中国海商法研究》 2016年第4期43-48,共6页

摘　　要： 近年来,船舶融资租赁案件作为一种新类型案件在海事审判中受到较大关注.审判实践中,对融资租赁法律关系的认定、合同违约金的调整、保证人主张融资额过高时的处理、律师费能否作为保证人担保的债务范围、如何确定租赁物的价值、出租人能否对租赁物采取强制措施等问题较为突出,亟待统一意见.为强化船舶融资租赁纠纷的风险治理,要进一步完善相关法律制度,健全行业监管体系,提高融资租赁企业的法律风险应对能力,积极构建多元纠纷解决机制. In recent years, shipping finance lease cases have attracted great attention in maritime trial. In judicial practice, there are a number of prominent issues needed to be unified, such as the determination on the legal relationship of finance lease, adjustment of liquidated damages, measures to handle issues when the guarantor claims that the amount of financing is too high, whether the attorney fee can be a debt as guaranteed by the guarantor, how to determine the value of the lease, whether the lessor can take coercive measures on the lease, etc. In order to strengthen the risk governance of disputes over shipping finance lease, we should further improve the relevant legal system, establish the supervisory system of the industry, improve the capacity of finance leasing companies when dealing with legal risks, and vigorously construct the diversified dis-pute resolution mechanism.

关 键 词： 船舶融资租赁 违约金调整 强制措施 风险治理

领　　域： [政治法律—国际法学] [政治法律—法学]