作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学法学院知识产权学院、中英国际海事法学院

出　　处： 《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2016年第6期112-121,共10页

摘　　要： 将同一视原理和组织责任论结合,以此作为单位犯罪处罚根据的解释在我国正得到越来越多学着的支持,然而,采取体制过失责任论追究单位的监督过失责任,就必然会与结果无价值的过失论产生矛盾。旧过失论坚持过失犯主体必须对构成要件事实具有高度具体的预见可能性,单位过失犯罪中的行为人或单位本身往往达不到这种程度。结果无价值的预见可能性学说无法适应单位过失犯罪的处罚要求,无法支撑体制过失论的解释;根据新过失论,只要有低度或相对具体的预见可能性就可以归责。采取体制过失责任论,就应当采取新过失论,这样单位犯罪论和过失犯罪论才能协调。行为无价值论是我国刑法体系建设的适宜选择。 In China more and more scholars endorse the theory of organizational crime for punishment based on a combination of identification doctrine and organizational liabilities. Nevertheless, there must be a contradiction between the theory of erfolgsunwert and organizational crime. The old negligent crime theory requires that the subjects of negligence should have a highly specific possibility of foreseeing, which is far from accomplishment. The new theory of negligent crime is conducive to the explanation of organizational negligent crime as well as foreseeing the possibility of organizational negligent crime. It is argued that the negligence theory of handlungsunwert is a proper choice in China＇ s criminal law system.

关 键 词： 单位犯罪 责任根据 预见可能性 过失犯 结果无价值

领　　域： [政治法律—刑法学] [政治法律—法学]