作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中国人民大学文学院

出　　处： 《中国人民大学学报》 2017年第5期141-149,共9页

摘　　要： 上博简《孔子诗论》"大雅"论简残严重,学界皆略而不论。根据对残简阙文性质的推测,所缺简文文字当为"《大雅》盛德也,多言[周],□□□□□□□□□□""[孔子]曰:诗其犹平门""[有怨王者何如?曰:《大雅》]是也"。简文的诗学意义在于,"盛德"论揭示出"大雅"文本内容实质是对周民族革故鼎新、除旧布新之维新精神的歌颂;"多言[周]""[有怨王者]"概括了"大雅"正反两方面内容性质;"□□□□□□□□□□"启示发现《诗经》四大门类的诗乐分家不同步,孔子时代"大雅"、"小雅"、"邦风"诗乐已分家,而尊贵的"颂"类还一直坚守着乐歌诗三位一体的最后领地。简文还透出另一信息:诗乐分家后,"大雅""小雅""邦风"仍可能保留着"徒歌"《诗》之文本的遗风。 Daya in the Chu State bamboo slip edition of Confucius Commentaries on The Book of Poet- ry in Shanghai Museum is missing seriously, which is scarcely touched upon in academic circles. Ac- cording to analysis of the contents of residual bamboo slips, the missing words are ＂Daya is praising the noble morality, mostly about （ Zhou ）, 口口口口口口口口口口＂ And Confucius said The Book of Poetry is divided equally. Significance of poetics lies in the fact that ＂praising the noble morality＂ reveals the essence of Daya text contents is a celebration of the endless innovation spirit of Zhou;＂Mostly about （ Zhou ） ＂ and ＂ （complaints about king） ＂ summed up both the positive and negative properties of Daya. ＂ 口口口口口口口口口口＂ reveals splits of poem and music between the four catego- ries of poem of the Book of Songs are not synchronized; noble ＂Ode＂ also has clung to the very end of the poetry and music trinity territory in Confucius era. It also gives another message： after the split between poetry and music, ＂Bangfeng＂ ＂Xiaoya＂ ＂Daya＂ may still retains the legacy of ＂pure songs＂ text of The Book of Poetry.

关 键 词： 孔子诗论 大雅 论 阙文 臆补 诗学史问题

领　　域： [文学—中国文学]