作　　者： (姜霞）; ;

机构地区： 湘潭大学法学院

出　　处： 《北京青年政治学院学报》 2002年第2期69-75,共7页

摘　　要： 民事诉讼中调解制度的废存与改革问题一直是学界争论的热点问题。我国民事诉讼调解无疑有其合理性,其解决纠纷的高效性是有目共睹的,而这正是纠纷日益膨胀的今天所必须的,但目前我国民事诉讼中实行的调审合一制度不仅没有发挥调解的优势,反而在扭曲调解制度的同时破坏了审判的公正性。因而应寻求一种既能充分发挥调解优势,又能保证审判的公正性的新制度,即调审分立制度。 Reserving or abolishing and reforming the mediation in civil proceedings has always been a problem argued warmly in the field of learning. The mediation in civil proceedings has its own rationality and its efficiency being there for all to see to solve disputes is necessary in these days when disputes are expanding day by day . However, the combination of judgment and mediation doesn't bring the mediation's superiority into play but damage the judgment's justness and distort the mediation. So we should seek a new system which can bring the mediation's superiority into full play and guarantee the judgment' s justness, that is the separation of judgment and mediation.

关 键 词： 民事诉讼 调解 判决

领　　域： [政治法律—诉讼法学] [政治法律—法学]