作　　者： ;

机构地区： 深圳大学法学院

出　　处： 《北方法学》 2010年第4期70-78,共9页

摘　　要： 我国刑事权运行中存在侦查机关的自行决定权力过大,检察机关的法律监督制约简单肤浅、流于形式,犯罪嫌疑人的辩护形无力虚,刑事诉讼参与人特别是犯罪嫌疑人缺乏有效的权利救济手段和途径的情况,使刑事侦查权因缺乏有效的监督制约而明显失衡,从而导致刑事司法权威与公信力的缺失。根据我国的司法实践结合国际公约的要求,必须在刑事侦查阶段建立中立、公正而又及时的司法审查,由法官主持司法介入审查刑事侦查权力行使的合法性,以防止侦查中滥用强制性措施对犯罪嫌疑人造成伤害,避免侦查权的异化,依法制约和规范刑事侦查行为,完善司法审判权的设置运行。 In regard to the exercise of criminal powers, the investigation departments have excessive discretion, and the legal supervision from the prosecution department is superficial and of mere formality. Besides, the defense of the suspect is in vain, and there is lack of remedies for participants in criminal procedures particularly the suspect. Thus, the ineffective and imbalanced supervision on criminal investigation has led to the derogation of judicial authority and public credibility in criminal procedures. Based on China＇s judicial practice and the requirements of international conventions, a neutral, justified and in - time judicial review should be set up in criminal investigation, and such review should be chaired by judges to evaluate its legality so as to prevent the abuse of coercive measures from causing damage to the suspect. It also can avoid the alienation of the investigation power and help constrain the behavior of criminal investigation and perfect the operation of judicial judgment.

关 键 词： 刑事侦查 侦查权 诉讼结构 司法审查 司法改革

领　　域： [政治法律—政治学] [政治法律—中外政治制度]