作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学资讯管理学院资讯管理系

出　　处： 《大学图书情报学刊》 2010年第1期84-87,共4页

摘　　要： 现今仍有许多学者对《隋书.经籍志》总集多有收录某些作者的个人作品集存有争议,如"毛伯成诗一卷"、"江淹拟古诗一卷"等;清朝的大学者姚振宗在其《隋书.经籍志考证》中也对"毛伯成诗一卷"、"百国诗四十三卷"等作品集何以被编入总集存有疑问。对此,文章将《四库全书总目提要》总集序与《隋书.经籍志》总集之小序所述进行比较,并对《隋书.经籍志》总集中的多个作品集进行分析,最后提出《隋书.经籍志》总集的概念与《四库全书总目提要》总集的概念,与我们现在所理解之总集的概念有所不同;后两者的"总集"是单纯的总而集之,而《隋书.经籍志》总集是"选而集之,而后总为一类成为总集"的观点。 There are still plenty of controversies over the general collection of Sui Books of Records and Classics among scholars, e. g. The Volume of Poems by Mao Bo-eheng, and the Volume of Imitation Ancient Poems by Jiang Yah, etc.. The great scholar of the Qing Dynasty Yao Zhen-zong rose some challenges on The Volume of Poems by Mao Bo-cheng, and 43 Volumes of Poems by Hundred Poets in Verifications of Sui Books of Records and Classics. The author of this article makes a comparison between the preface to Annotated General Catalog of the Complete Library of the Four Treasures and the preface to Sui Books of Records and Classics ,and analyzes some classic works collected in the general collection of Sui Books of Records and Classics. The author draws a conclusion that the concepts of the two general collections are greatly different from our concept. The latter two general collections mean complete, while the general collection of Sui Books of Records and Classics simply means selected.

关 键 词： 隋书 经籍志 四库全书总目提要 总集

领　　域： [文化科学—图书馆学]