作 者: ;
机构地区: 韶关学院文学院
出 处: 《韶关学院学报》 2007年第11期64-67,共4页
摘 要: 历史上关于哈姆莱特延宕的解释,存在一个共同的误解:把复仇理解为仅仅涉及哈姆莱特一人的事情,相对忽视其对手克劳狄斯。博弈论则另辟蹊径,将哈姆莱特和克劳狄斯放在对等的住置上,指出哈姆莱特的延宕是两人在互动中产生的选择困境所导致的结果,从而为破解哈姆莱特之谜提供了一种新的方法和思路。 There is a common misunderstanding in the history of interpreting the hesitation of Hamlet, which takes the revenge as a thing concerning Hamlet simply and ignores the tactics of Claudius. From the special angle of game theory, this article regards them as two equal characteristics, and points out that the hesitation of Hamlet is the inevitable outcome of the choice dilemma produced in the mutual restrict of Hamlet and Claudius.
领 域: [文学—中国文学]