作 者: ;
机构地区: 东莞理工学院政法学院
出 处: 《东莞理工学院学报》 2010年第6期19-22,共4页
摘 要: 家庭成员之间的权利与义务关系主要根据血缘亲情而构建,涉及到一系列伦理价值判断。2001年婚姻法仅规定离婚后未与子女共同生活一方父或母有探望权,忽略了子女主动与父母进行亲情沟通的伦理需要,将子女置于被动的客体地位。笔者认为,被探望的子女绝非探望权的义务主体,法律进一步明确未成年子女作为探望权的权利主体,符合探望权的伦理价值取向。 The rights and duties of family members are constructed according to blood and emotion,which involves a series of ethic evaluation.Marriage Law adopted in 2001 stipulates that only the father or mother who has not live together with the child(ren) has visitation right;the law ignores the ethic needs of the child(ren) to take the initiative to communicate with their parents and thus make the children a passive role.The author holds that the child (ren) is(are) not the subjects of duties in visitation;the law should clearly stipulate that the child(ren) is(are) the subject of visitation right and such a stipulation is in accordance with ethic values.
关 键 词: 未成年子女 最大利益 探望权 探望权主体 伦理考察
领 域: [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] [政治法律—法学]