作 者: ;
机构地区: 中山大学人文科学学院历史系
出 处: 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 2016年第2期94-109,159,共16页
摘 要: 汉宋之分争,乃清学史一大议题。厘清汉学一词从无到有之发生,梳证汉学名义因人、因时、因事之演进、递变,则为原始要终、正本清源地认识汉宋问题之入手门径。江藩撰《汉学师承记》,旗帜鲜明地以汉学为名勾勒清代经学师承,突出强调了汉学在清学中之核心位置,引起同时及后世学人的不同反应,是重审汉学名义及《汉学师承记》旨趣之绝佳线索。以江藩所坚持之汉学名义为线索,可证学术史中汉学之称,最早专于《易》汉学与《易》王(弼)学之分别,后经惠栋承袭,加以阐释扩充,独树一帜,影响扩张,遂引发辨析争议。江藩坚执惠栋汉学之名义,不惜显露突兀的门户之见,以汉学通贯不能以汉学限之的清代经学与经师,实因应于戴震一系学人破惠氏汉学之举,并非有意与宋学相争为敌,乃意在为惠栋及其汉学争立学术之正宗与统系。 Controversies concerning Han xue(汉学,Han school of Confucianism) and Song xue(宋学,Song school of Confucianism) were very important an academic issue in the Qing Dynasty.The best way to understand it is to study the derivation and evolution of the words Han xue,which appeared in the influential book Han Xue Shi Cheng Ji(《汉学师承记》),written by Hui Dong's disciple,Jiang Fan,to talk about the academics of his time.By studying this book,it can be known that Han xue were derived from yi Han xue(易汉学,Han school of I Ching research),which corresponded to y/Wang xue(易王学,Wang Bi's study of I Ching).Adopted and transformed by Hui Dong,Han xue became widely accepted in the Qing Dynasty.To justify Hui Dong's efforts must be Jiang Fan's intention when writing his Han Xue Shi Cheng Ji,with which he might push back the criticism from Dai Zhen and his disciples.
领 域: [历史地理—历史学] [历史地理—中国史]