机构地区: 中山大学人文科学学院中文系
出 处: 《学术研究》 2006年第1期119-124,共6页
摘 要: “文本于经”说是中国传统文学批评的基本观念之一,但至今尚未得到深入研究。从文体学的角度看,“文本于经”说体现了古代学术源流和学术分类的思想,亦与文学逐渐走向自觉的时代发展有关。古人认为,五经是文章之极致,也是文体的渊源,而后世各类文体之所以能分别归源于五经,其理论前提则是五经各自有体。经各有体的观念对文体分类学有深远影响,古代文体学正是在此基础上建构了一套以经为本的文体谱系。除了为文体溯源外,“文本于经”说还有宗经或尊体的理论目的,有时甚至是一种名为宗经实为尊体的理论策略,因此,不能仅仅从文体发生学的角度对其中某些论述作出简单的判定。 Ancient people did not only consider'the five classics'as essential literary works, but also as the genesis of stylistics. The reason that all kinds of works afterwards can be classified in the light of'the five classics'with different styles is that'the five classics'have their own styles themselves. This argument has made great effects on the classification of styles. Besides the origin of styles,'the Chinese literary works were rooted in the five classics'was to show respects to the classics and styles, sometimes even a strategy to honor the latter rather than the former.
领 域: [文学—中国文学]