作　　者： ;

机构地区： 苏州大学文学院

出　　处： 《保定学院学报》 2009年第2期94-97,共4页

摘　　要： 《史记》《汉书》比较研究自古以来就是一个重要研究视点。唐前《史记》《汉书》比较研究集中于"史汉优劣论",评论者往往从自身主观愿望出发,对两书作出简短的论断,尽管他们的论断并不客观,作出的论述缺乏说服力,研究方法也流于粗疏,但是,这些直观式的评论为日后的进一步研究打下了基础。 Comparative study of Records of the Historian and Hanshu has been an important item since ancient times, The judgement of Records of the Historian and Hanshu was the concentrated study of pre-Tang Dynasties. Though people only gave short comments on them, sometimes they seems subjective, and the methods they used was very simple, however they were the basis of later studies. So we have no reason to ignore this period for it＇s so important.

关 键 词： 唐前 史记 汉书 比较研究 史汉优劣论

领　　域： [文学—中国文学]