作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东工业大学政法学院法律系

出　　处： 《学术研究》 2016年第4期72-78,177,共7页

摘　　要： 国内关于知识产权质权性质的认识仍然存在争议。众说纷纭的各种理论歧见,既无法解决自身的理论周延性问题,也无法消弭知识产权质押融资的实务困惑。经过分析论证,结论是:知识产权质权是一种技术性民事权利,而不是独立的实质性民事权利;它既不是物权,也不是债权;它是权利担保权,旨在担保债,是由法律规定的债的优先受偿之特别效力。我国的知识产权质权立法,应据此调整与完善。 There are different theories about the nature of the pledge right of intellectual property, and each of them can't solve the problem of theoretical interpretation, and cannot eliminate the practical dilemmas in the intellec-tual property rights and pledge financing. After a thorough analysis and discussions in the thesis, viewpoints are drawn as the follows: the pledge right of intellectual property is a technical civil right, rather than a separate substantive civil right. It is neither a real right, nor a debt right. It is the right to pledge or guarantee the debt,and it is regulated by law, especially in the effectiveness of priority of the debt. The paper suggests that the le-gal regulation of the pledge right of intellectual property in China be improved and adjusted in accordance with the above ideas.

关 键 词： 知识产权 质权 抵押权 留置权 担保权

领　　域： [政治法律—民商法学] [政治法律—法学]