作 者: ;
机构地区: 上海交通大学人文学院历史系
出 处: 《上海经济研究》 2013年第7期147-156,共10页
摘 要: 本文基于文贯中等人提出的解释1959-1961年大饥荒的"退堂权"假说,对张乐天、范子英等人的质疑及文贯中的回应进行梳理,在此基础上,进行进一步的质疑和回应,指出这一假说所面临的挑战主要来自两个方面:一是公共食堂造成粮食浪费的程度问题;另一为各地食堂的解散时间与饥荒结束时间的同步性问题。从现有的资料数据上看,虽然这两方面的质疑无法完全成立,但"退堂权"假说亦无法完全令人信服。 Based on the hypothesis of fight to free exit from communal dining halls which explains the Chinese famine of 1959 - 1961, the questioned arguments and their responses, this article shows further discussion of this topic. And we point out that there are two things may challenge this hypothesis : firstly, how serious was the food waste caused by communal dining halls; secondly, was there causality between the end of the communal dining halls and the famine. Still, these doubts lack of evidence, at the meantime, so does the hypothesis.
领 域: [经济管理—世界经济]