作　　者： ;

机构地区： 清华大学人文学院哲学系

出　　处： 《中国社会科学》 2022年第7期4-20,204,共18页

摘　　要： 现代性的多元镜鉴是在确认西方现代文明之在先性的同时,提出并论证现代文明及其“现代性”本身的多元生成之可能。通过审察在先的西方现代性生成和演进过程的复杂性、内在张力和当代困境,揭示现代性的基本机理和现代性的多种可能性进路,亦即“西方现代性”之外的另外一种或多种现代性的可能路径,比如中国现代性及其现实可能。经济全球化是实现人类社会“现代性”目标的第一步,也是其必由之路,任何“逆全球化”和“反全球化”的主张和行为,都会妨碍甚至中断人类社会通向“现代性”理想目标的进程。历史和现实经验证明,“构建人类命运共同体”是迄今为止寻求并切近人类“现代性”理想更适合也更具解释力的导向性理念,在理论解释力和彻底性上优于既有的诸如“普世主义”“普遍主义”“世界主义”和“全球主义”,是当代中国对人类现代性的最新理解。 Plural mirroring towards modernity refers to recognizing the pioneering nature of modern Western civilization while at the same time proposing and arguing for the possibility of a pluralistic creation of modern civilization and“modernity.”By examining the complexity,inherent tensions and contemporary dilemmas of the process of generation and evolution of Western modernity,this article attempts to reveal the basic mechanism of modernity and the many possible paths towards modernity other than“Western modernity,”such as Chinese modernity and its possibility of realization.Economic globalization is the first and the only step towards achieving the goal of“modernity”in human society;any“de-globalization”or“antiglobalization”ideas and behaviors will hinder or even interrupt the process of human society to the ideal goal of“modernity.”History and reality have proved that“building a community with a shared future for mankind”is by far the most suitable concept in terms of explanatory power for humankind to pursue the ideal of“modernity.”It is theoretically and thoroughly superior to the existing“universalism,”“cosmopolitanism”and“globalism,”and is the latest understanding of contemporary Chinese of human modernity.

关 键 词： 西方现代文明 西方现代性 反全球化 世界主义 逆全球化 全球主义 中国现代性 普世主义

领　　域： [文学—中国文学]