作　　者： ;

机构地区： 暨南大学

出　　处： 《社会科学》 2016年第10期141-151,共11页

摘　　要： 中国古代经学家宣称“经为常道”，与此相对的诸子学则为“异端”。乾嘉时期，这种观念发生了转变。乾嘉学者从道体的开放、经书系统的重建和经与子之道器名分的转变等方面，扭转了经子关系。他们不仅肯定了诸子之道的合法性，要为“异端”正名，甚至把子书升格为经书，尝试整合经学与子学。这拓展和丰富了乾嘉义理学的范围，也开启了晚清诸子学复兴的路径。 The Chinese ancient scribes declared that the Confucianism is the regular road, on the contrary, the pre-Qin philosophers＇ learning is unorthodox, however, this concept changed in Qianjia era. This article investigates this academic phenomenon about the transformation of the relationship between Confucian Classics and ＂pre-Qin philosophers＇ learning＂ in Qianjia era from three aspects： the opening of Taoism, the rebuilding of Confucian Classics＇ system and the transformation of Confucian Classics and ＂pre-Qin philosophers＇ learning＂ in Taoism and implement. Thus, Qianjia scholars not only have proved its legitimacy, but also wanted to improve its status as important as Confucian Classics, and tried to make them into a unit. This method not only enriches the range of Qianjia Philosophy, also opens the path of pre-Qin philosophers＇ learning revival in the late Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词： 乾嘉 经子关系 道体 经书 道器

分 类 号： [B249]

领　　域： []