作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东白云学院

出　　处： 《孔子研究》 2003年第1期43-50,共8页

摘　　要： 中国传统哲学属于境界形态的形而上学，它与西方的自亚里士多德以来的实体形态的形而上学不同，亚氏的形而上学是由对是的逻辑分析开始的，即由对逻辑命题的分析而寻找不变的实体存在。亚氏的思维方式对西方文化产生了深远的影响。中国传统哲学则不然，它是由“省身”，“尽心、知性、知天”，“思诚”、“静观”，“玄贤”、觉悟而去认识世界的本体，这种形而上学固然是境界形态的，至于现代，西方哲学出现了转向，存在主义者海德格尔对存在（是）作了新的诠释，海氏的诠释在某种意义上与中国传统哲学有契合之处，这从一个侧面说明了中国传统哲学所潜含的现代意义。 Traditional Chinese philosophy belongs to the metaphysics in the idealistic phase, it is therefore different from the Western metaphysics in the substantial phase ever handed down from Aristotle. While developing his metaphysics by logically analyzing “be', Aristotle sought for the unchanged substantial existence through analysis of logic proposition. Hence his way of thinking has all along influenced Western culture. Traditional Chinese philosophy, different from this, has always aimed to have self-consciousness and then to know the noumenon of the universe through “introspection', “seeking the essence and understand Nature by using subjective initiative', “longing for sincerity' and “mysterious consciousness'. Hence it is still a metaphysics in the spiritual phase. However, during modern times, the Western philosophy has turned its direction, and Heidegger, say, has offered a new interpretation of “being', which happens to coincide with certain aspects of traditional Chinese philosophy. This illustrates, from a certain perspective, the modern meaning potentially hidden in traditional Chinese philosophy.

关 键 词： 境界 实体 形而上学 中国哲学 西方哲学 海德格尔 存在主义 儒家 黑格尔 理性 思维方式 亚里士多德

分 类 号： [B019.12 ]

领　　域： []