作　　者： (）;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学

出　　处： 《交大法学》 2019年第2期36-46,共11页

摘　　要： 与"法律融入"相比,信托的"学理融入"并不顺利。但既有的争论因未看到信托的叛逆本质而不尽如人意。罗马法的信托与英美法的信托,都是对既有制度的反叛。这是信托核心的特质:因其乃是为了更好地实现当事人的个人意图。正因如此,信托的功能性和工具性也得以凸显。信托的融入涉及政策层面和技术层面:前者要求法律对规避行为更加宽容;后者则应当采取一个二段式的认定方式——财产的独立为信托机制的适用提供可能性;而一经适用,则可以排除物债之辩,以具体化和个案化的方式来维护当事人的真实意思。 The"jurisprudential integration"of trust is not as smooth as its"legal integration",while the existing disputes are not satisfactory failing to grasp the rebellious concept of trust.The trust in Roman law and the trust in Anglo-American law are both rebellions against the existing system of institution.It is the core characteristic as well as the purpose of a trust that to realize the personal intention of the parties,which highlights the function and instrumentality of trust.The integration of trust involves policy and technology:the former requires the power and authority to be more tolerant of circumvention;the latter should adopt a two-stage identification method-the independence of property provides the possibility for the application of the trust mechanism;once it is applied,the traditional dualistic property system can be excluded to ensure the true will of the parties in a specific and individual way.

关 键 词： 信托 罗马法 英美法 财产独立 个案化

领　　域： []