作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院

出　　处： 《探索与争鸣》 2018年第12期70-86,93,F0002,150,共20页

摘　　要： 国内学者试图以完全相反的方式将"国王的两个身体"这一英国中世纪政治神学中的经典拟制适用于现代政治,但这一隐喻无论是从空间还是时间维度上进行扩展解读,都会遭遇有机论国家观与现代抽象国家观的对立,而后者本质上是一个个人主义背景下抽象的人民主权者的建构问题。现代政治要面对的是人民的两种形态,即抽象化的人民与具象化的人民及其关系问题,它与"人民的两个身体"存在根本差别。现代人民主权政治优先考虑的是政治正当性的辩护根据,而非政治生活中的神圣性体验问题。相应地,现代政治共同体的延续性与同一性,也是通过人民建构所依据的规范性原则及其制度化表达的持续性,而非"两个身体"隐喻背后的政治神学框架来保证的。 Some Chinese scholars attempt to apply the classic fiction in the medieval political theology in England, "the king′ s two bodies", to modern politics in opposite ways. But this metaphor will give rise to the conflict between the conceptions of the organic state and that of the modern abstract state whether it is interpreted extensively in temporal or spatial dimensions. The problem of the abstract state is essentially one of the construction of the abstract sovereign people under the background of individualism. The crucial point of modern politics lies in the abstract and visual forms of the people and their relationship, and it is radically different from "the people′ s two bodies". For the popular sovereignty, the rational justification of political legitimacy enjoys its priority over the experiences of the sacred in political life. As a result, the continuity and identity of the modern political community are ensured by those normative principles grounding the construction of the sovereign people and the continuity of their institutional embodiment, not by the framework of the political theology behind the metaphor of "two bodies".

关 键 词： 国王的两个身体 有机论国家 抽象国家 人民的两个身体 人民建构

领　　域： []