作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东金融学院

出　　处： 《系统管理学报》 2015年第6期864-873,共10页

摘　　要： 基于两国企业存在碳减排效率差异的实际状况,构建了两国政府选择碳税、碳排放配额或碳排放权交易政策,以及企业选择碳减排水平的两阶段博弈模型,并运用逆向求解法求出了均衡解,发现两国政府均选择碳排放权交易政策可以成为最优的气候政策组合。从全球福利和环境效应来看,该最优政策组合既可改善全球福利,也可显著降低碳排放总量;从经济效应来看,两国均选择碳排放权交易政策并不能完全提高各国贸易效应和市场效应。研究表明,发达国家之间容易建立碳交易市场,中国等发展中国家加入全球碳交易还需时日。 Based on the fact that two firms located in two countries are different in efficiency of carbon reduction,we construct a two-stage model between government choice of environmental policies and firms＇ abatement strategy.The Nash equilibrium is obtained by solving the model with backward induction.We find that both countries choose carbon emission trading policy can be an optimal environmental policy.Taking global welfare and carbon reduction into account,though the optimal environmental policy can surely improve both global welfare and lower global carbon emission.However,regarding to profit and market share,the optimal environmental policy is not able to surely increase profit and market share of the firm in the country choosing other environmental policies.Thus it is plausible for developed countries to establish carbon trading market,and developing countries like China takes time to join it.

关 键 词： 碳税 碳排放配额 碳排放权交易 环境效应 贸易效应

分 类 号： [X01 X22]

领　　域： [] []