作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学

出　　处： 《哲学研究》 2014年第5期52-58,共7页

摘　　要： 《四书》与《六经》的关系问题，是四书学乃至中国哲学史上的一个重要问题。它之所以被提出，主要源于宋儒朱熹的“四子，《六经》之阶梯”（《朱子语类》卷一。五，第2629页）的先《四书》后《六经》的“四书六经观”。这一问题的学术意义在于，《四书》与《六经》孰先孰后，孰为主导，反映了两种迥异的学术主张，甚至代表着不同的学术时代。一般而言， The problem of the relations between the Four Books and the Six Classics concerns the quarrels between Han and Song scholarships,being an important subject-matter in history of the Four Books scholarship,even of Chinese philosophy.This problem emerged,so to speak,because of the Song scholar Zhu Xi's saying that the Si Zi(the Four Books) formed an introduction to the Six Classics.Among the Yuan scholars,some as 'pro-Zhu' ones strictly kept Zhu's saying,some became 'anti-Zhu' on account of northern convention of scholarship or northern political reality,some tried to pose new 'opinions on the Four Books and Six Classics' revealing why the Four Books could be unified perfectly with the Six Classics;so we cannot say that the Yuan Scholars are uncreative totally,as some people say.Such a picture shows unique characteristics of the Yuan Dynasty as a power framed by a northern and Mongolian nation.

关 键 词： 《六经》 《四书》 学者 元代 《朱子语类》 学术意义 中国哲学史 关系问题

分 类 号： [B244.7]

领　　域： []