作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学

出　　处： 《国家检察官学院学报》 2008年第2期 87-93,共7页

摘　　要： 审判对象发生变更，主要表现为控诉方起诉变更和法官变更罪名，其过程往往体现为控诉权与司法控制两种力量的交错运行，表现为一种权力关系。为了避免变更行为的恣意，就要合理配置变更过程的权力关系。审判对象变更不可能纯粹是控审两种权力间博弈与分配利益的行动，被告人的权利同样构成一项重要的考虑因素。在我国，检察官有权撤回、变更甚至追加起诉，法官有权直接变更罪名，审判对象变更往往表现为审判机关与控诉机关的一种“沟通”，在该权力关系视野下，被告人防御权利极容易被忽略。为此，应当理顺审判对象变更机制中的权力配置关系，设置变更的合理限度和保障程序，明确法官的司法控制职责，完善撤诉、延期审理等具体制度，从而构筑一种完善的审判对象变更机制。 The change of trial object includes change of crime which in essence is the relationship between two authorities. Proper means must be adapt to prevent the abuse in the distribution process of power in this process. Rights of defendant are also concerued. In china prosecutor can change the crime or even redraw a case and the court can change the name of crime abruptly in court. However the rights of defendant are easily ignored. Reform shall be adapted as following： streamline the relationship between prosecution and judge, to set up reasonable change procedure, clearly define the judicial review function, to better the case withdrawing system and thus to establish a good changing mechanism for object of criminal trial.

关 键 词： 审判对象 变更机制 权力关系 被告人权利 实证考察

分 类 号： [D915.182]

领　　域： []