作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学

出　　处： 《哲学研究》 2007年第7期 79-84,共6页

摘　　要： 自从古希腊在哲学（沉思）的生活与政治（行动）的生活之间作出区分以来，至少在西方，人们就把政治与行动联系在一起，从而政治也就具有了动态和开放的特征。政治之所以是动态的，是因为它意味着某种类型的行动过程；政治之所以是开放的，是因为动态的行动过程究竟可能导致什么样的后果和影响，这一点在政治的范围内很难给出确切的答案。 Action is a traditional basic dimension of politics. As a capacity of free action, on one hand, political action can only be exercised after the establishment of institutional norms, but it can’t help in the process of their establishment. On the other hand, this capacity of free action may breach the constraint of any institutional norms, and therefore has its potential demolishment. It is the problem that all kinds of theories about norms have not solved that how the human being can freely establish institutional norms through political action, and so form a stable institutional structure based on and including political action. This paper tries to indicates that Rawls’ method of political constructivism is an illuminating approach for the resolution of this problem.

关 键 词： 政治行动 制度规范 阐释 古典 古希腊 生活 开放

分 类 号： [D51]

领　　域： []