作 者: ;
机构地区: 华南师范大学法学院
出 处: 《政治与法律》 2018年第4期67-80,共14页
摘 要: 行政处罚委托实质是一种“间接授权”,应受法律保留原则、法律位阶原则、授权明确性原则和比例原则的约束。委托对象包括下级行政机关、没有隶属关系的行政机关、行政机构和从事公益服务的事业组织,不包括企业。委托机关只能将其拥有的部分处罚权委托行使,委托内容涉及立案权、调查权、取证权、程序事项进行权、决定权等全部权限。委托方式以行政协议为宜,委托程序应经过评估、甄选、协商签约和公告的环节。被委托组织在委托权限范围内享有处罚的管辖权和决定权,应以自己的名义作出处罚决定并对外承担法律责任,委托机关享有监督权。 The delegation of administrative penalty is essentially a kind of indirect empowerment whichshould be governed by such principles as law reservation, hierarchy of laws, definitude of empowerment andproportionality. The organizations to be delegated include the lower administrative agencies, other adminis-trative agencies or bodies without subordinate relations with the original authorities and public institutionsengaged in public interest services, and exclude enterprises. The delegating agency can only delegate partof its power to impose penalty. The content of delegation relates to every aspect of such power including thepower to accept a case, investigate, obtain evidence, proceed with procedural matters, and make decisions.The administrative agreement is a suitable way for delegation. The delegation shall go through four steps ofevaluation, selection, agreement conclusion through negotiation and announcement. The organizations to bedelegated enjoy the power to govern and decide the penalty within the scope of delegation and shall make adecision on penalty in its own name and assume legal responsibility to outsiders, while the delegating agen-cies have the supervision power.
分 类 号: [DF3]
领 域: []