帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

中国高等教育扩张的得与失——围绕国内学术界三大争鸣的政策效应评价

作  者: ;

机构地区: 暨南大学

出  处: 《中国人口科学》 2017年第1期115-125,共11页

摘  要: 文章分别从教育发展、社会公平和人口红利3个视角综述了国内学术界关于高等教育扩张政策效应的理论和实证研究,并展示了正反两方各种观:占’之间的对立与统一。从现有研究的结论来看,扩张政策既可能通过提高教育资源利用效率和促进人才培养多元化推动教育发展,也可能通过降低教育质量和催生过度教育现象损害教育发展。既可能通过促进人力资本积累和推动人口城市化增进人口红利,也可能通过降低人力资本利用效率和加剧人口老龄化减少人口红利。而在扩张政策如何通过影响教育公平和收入不平等进而影响社会公平这一议题上,学界出现了针锋相对的观点。高校扩招是好是坏,得失之间孰轻孰重?目前学界尚未达成共识,但总体而言,学界对高等教育扩张政策效应持负面态度的占优。文章认为,扩张政策既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面,必须一分为二地看待,坚持两点论。 This paper reviews domestic academic theoretical and empirical studies on China's higher education expansion policy effect with three perspectives of the education development, social justice and demographic dividend, and shows the opposition and unity between the views of two sides. According to the existing research conclusions, the expansion can not only promote the development of education by enhancing the education resource utilization efficiency and promoting the diversified personnel training, but also damage the education development by lowering the quality of education and creating excessive education phenomenon. It can not only promote human capital accumulation and enhance the population urbanization to increase demographic dividend, but also lower the use efficiency of human capital and intensify an ageing population to reduce the demographic dividend. However, academic viewpoints are debating on the issue how the expansion policy by influencing the education equity and income inequality affects social justice. Is higher education expansion policy good or bad? Which effect is dominant between its gain and loss? At present the consensus has not been reached in the academic circles. Overall, the negative attitude dominates the studies of the effect of the policy of higher education expansion. This paper argues that the expansion policy has both positive aspect and negative side, and the two aspects of the issue need to be discussed simultaneously.

关 键 词: 高等教育 高校扩招 教育发展 社会公平 人口红利

分 类 号: [G40]

领  域: []

相关作者

相关机构对象

相关领域作者