作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学

出　　处： 《现代法学》 2006年第3期 174-181,共8页

摘　　要： 当下中国经济法学的逻辑假设建立在西方经济法范式的基础之上，无法与中国现实达成和谐。提出“转轨经济法学”的概念可以使中国的经济法学研究回归到转轨中国的社会现实中来，解决改革现实中的真问题，自觉区别于西方范式，消解中国经济法学严重的正当性危机。转轨经济法的历史使命不是要通过政府来弥补市场缺陷而是要培育市场；转轨经济法的核心任务是反行政干预而不是反垄断；转轨经济法的基本功能是控权而不是授权；转轨经济法应以公平为第一价值取向。 The present logic of China＇s economic law is based on the paradigm of western economic law, which fails to accord with real life in China. Advocating ＂transitional economic law＂ may turn the study of China＇s economic law back to social realities in China, so as to settle down problems arising out of or pertaining to China＇s reform. This differs from the western paradigm as it passes through the crisis of the justification of China＇s economic law. The historic mission of ＂transitional economic law＂ is to cultivate markets＇ rather than cure market defects by way of governmental interference. The heavy task of ＂transitional economic law＂ runs against administrative interference rather than anti-trust. The basic function of ＂transitional economic law＂ is to control power rather than vest power. Fairness and justice is given a top value in ＂transitional economic law. ＂

关 键 词： 转轨经济法学 西方范式 中国现实

分 类 号： [D922.29]

领　　域： []