作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学

出　　处： 《河北法学》 2018年第6期89-101,共13页

摘　　要： 违法合同无效后损害赔偿范围的量定,实务中争议的焦点是无效行为存续期间的获利返还,这一问题可以通过不当得利、缔约过失予以分析,但二者在具体适用中的效果需要进一步研判。不当得利制度的目的不在于填补损害,而在于使受领人返还其无法律上原因所受的利益,效果上难以覆盖受损人的全部损失。缔约上过失制度中,受损人具有过错并不排除其损害赔偿请求权,而是参酌其对缔约行为的合理信赖程度适用与有过失规则;缔约过失责任的赔偿范围应当根据个案事实情况,在信赖利益至全部损失之间衡量。 When determining the range of damage compensation in invalid contract,the focus of controversy in practice is the profit return during the period of invalid behavior,this problem can be analyzed through unjust enrichment and contractual negligence,the effect of the two in the specific application needs further study. The function of unjust enrichment does not lie in filling the damage,but rather to return the recipient ＇s benefits without legal cause,its effect is difficult to cover the total loss of the impaired person. In the system of contractual negligence,the fault of the impaired person does not exclude the claim for damages; the rule of contributory negligence could be applied according to the reasonable degree of trust in the contractual acts;the scope of compensation shall be measured between the trust and the total loss,based on the facts of the case. Article 157 of the General Principles of Civil Law provides for exceptions to the invalidity of legal acts,reserving spaces for the interest clearing issues of invalid legal acts in special circumstances. During the compilation of civil code,it is necessary to sort out and improve the relevant claim right system about the invalid legal action.

关 键 词： 合同无效 损害赔偿 获利返还 不当得利 信赖利益

分 类 号： [DF525]

领　　域： []