作　　者： ;

机构地区： 南方医科大学

出　　处： 《河北法学》 2011年第2期147-155,共9页

摘　　要： “社会危害性”紧贴社会，它已经随着社会的演进而呈现出新的时代特征。在风险社会之下，学界要用发展的眼光看问题，非议态度将有所改观。“社会危害性”的“社会”指的是社会关系。社会危害性具有朴实性、民主性、道德性、法定性的特征。在当代中国内地，社会危害性并不具有阶级性；社会危害性与罪刑法定原则的追求相同；社会危害性是刑事违法性的根据，是第一性的，但在司法中要受到罪刑法定原则的制约。犯罪本质和犯罪构成体系并不存在惟一性的对应关系，犯罪本质由刑法规定，犯罪构成体系却可以选择适用。在正当防卫、紧急避险的场合，犯罪构成的判断是惟一性的，犯罪构成并未被虚置。社会危害性比法益的内涵更深刻、直白，更具有优越性。 The social harmfulness theory has its new features with the social development. Scholars will change their standpoints if they take the approachs of development in risk society. The society means social relations here. The social harmfulness is literal, democratic, moral and lawful. In chinese mainland today, the social harmfulness has no class nature. The social harmfulness theory has the same value as the principle of crimes and punishment stipulated by law. The social harmfulness produces the criminal illegality and is restricted by the principle of crimes and punishment stipulated by law. The criminal essence is not always matched with the system of constitution of crimes. The criminal essence comes form penal code, but scholars can choose the pattern of system of constitution of crimes. When justifiable defense or act of rescue happens, constitution of a crime is the only standard to judge. The social harmfulness is more profound, direct and superior than Rechtsgiiter.

关 键 词： 社会危害性 风险社会 罪刑法定原则 法益

分 类 号： [D917]

领　　域： []