作 者: ;
机构地区: 南方医科大学
出 处: 《法学论坛》 2011年第2期88-92,共5页
摘 要: 最后手段原则源于法治国的比例原则,它包含了非犯罪化、非刑罚化和轻刑化的内容。欠缺实证检验、欠缺独立的规范功能、欠缺精准性是其内在的缺憾。风险社会对其提出了客观的和主观的挑战,我国的应然态度是:坚守原则、保留例外,立足本土、灵活运用,并注意法益理论的困境。其中,例外存在于公共利益的领域。最后手段原则虽然在发展过程中遭遇了困境,但是依然值得立法者奉为信条。 Utima Ratio is derived from the principle of proportionality in legal state. It includes decriminalization, depenalization and light punishment. But it lacks tests, an independent normative importance and precision. The risk society does really challenge Utima Ratio. So in China,we should keep to this principle first, and then reserve exception. In addition, we should look to the crimes circle from different countries and the plight of rechtsgilter. Moreover, exception inheres in public interest. In short, although Utima Ratio gets stuck,it is the primal faith to legislator.
分 类 号: [D914]
领 域: []