作 者: (益言);
机构地区: 不详
出 处: 《中国货币市场》 2017年第8期67-72,共6页
摘 要: 跨境资本流动可以为各国带来明显好处,但也可能导致系统性金融风险的累积。不少国家开始使用宏观审慎措施管理资本流动引发的系统性风险。资本流动管理措施与宏观审慎措施之间虽存在差异,但也有重叠,两者之间的界线开始模糊,由此引发国际上对于如何界定两者以及处理两者重叠情况等问题的争论。因此对资本流动管理措施及宏观审慎措施的定义、差异及区分方法进行梳理确有必要。 A flow of capital around the world can bring obvious benefits to countries involved, but it may also lead to an accumulation of systemic financial risks. A number of countries have started to adopt macro-prudential measures to manage systemic risks caused by capital flows. Though there are differences between capital flow management and macro-prudential measures, there is an overlap between them and the divide has been blurred, which arouses a .qlobal debate on the classification of the two types of measures and on how to handle the overlap. Therefore, it is rather necessary to summarize the definition of capital flow management and macro-prudential measures, and to find the distinct and distinguishing methods between them.