作　　者： (桑远棵）;

机构地区： 武汉大学法学院

出　　处： 《北京仲裁》 2017年第2期60-76,共17页

摘　　要： 近些年，司法实践中发生的多起案件，法院以不具有涉外因素为由而否定仲裁协议的效力和拒绝执行仲裁裁决，由此引发了诸多质疑，如涉外因素是否应作为民商事案件当事人约定境外仲裁机构的核心条件，以及我国法院在判定涉外因素时所采用的模式是否合理。本文就搜集的法院案例进行归纳与思考，认为我国法律没有禁止当事人将不具有涉外因素的案件提交境外仲裁机构，涉外因素也不应当作为约定境外仲裁机构的在先条件，我国多数法院判定涉外因素所采用的认定模式也不适当，最后就其不合理之处提出可行性方案。 In recent years, in judicial practices, there have been several cases that courts negate the validity of arbitral agreement or clause and reject enforcing of arbitral awards based on those cases with no foreign-related element, it causes a series of doubts and questionsthat whether foreign-related element shall be set as a core condition for case parties to agree with a foreign arbitral institution, and the model or standard to ascertain foreign-related element is reasonable or not. This article summarizes and analyzes these collected judicial cases, taking a view that laws of China do not prohibit the parties to submit to foreign ar- bitral institution when there is no foreign-related element in the case, and foreign-related element shall not be regarded as a preliminary condition to choose foreign arbitral institution, another point is that the model for ascertaining foreign-related element a majority of courts adopt is not appropriate, this article also gives out feasible ways in terms of its inappropriateness at last

关 键 词： 涉外因素 仲裁协议 仲裁裁决 法律关系三要素