作　　者： (蒋淑华）; (秦建凡）; (李志文）;

机构地区： 中山市体育场馆管理中心,广东中山528403

出　　处： 《中国照明电器》 2017年第8期40-42,共3页

摘　　要： 体育场馆作为专业的体育比赛场所,对灯光的照度要求较高,目前普遍采用金属卤化物灯光源。LED灯由于高效、环保、寿命长等特点,有逐步取代体育场馆传统照明光源的趋势。本文通过在中山市体育馆副馆(训练馆)对LED灯的试用,对其与传统金属卤化物灯的经济效益进行了对比,数据各有优劣。建议根据自己的体育场地状况与经济能力考虑是否采用LED照明。 Stadium is a professional venue for sports events, in which there is a higher demand for illumination. At present, metal halide lamp is still the widely adopted light sources for stadium lighting. Light-emitting diode （LED） lamps, due to greater lifespan, environmentally friendliness, and higher efficacy, have become an apt alternative to traditional sports lighting sources. A field test of the use of LED lamps in Zhongshan City Stadium （ training ground） was carried out. The economic analysis of LED lighting retrofit in the stadium, compared with the traditional metal halide lamps was conducted and the data show that each has its advantages and disadvantages. It is s equipment should be based upon physical and financial condition of uggested that the choice of lighting each venue.

关 键 词： 金属卤化物灯 灯 节能 经济效益