作　　者： (邵维国）;

机构地区： 广州大学法学院,广东广州510006

出　　处： 《现代法学》 2017年第4期124-133,共10页

摘　　要： 对于行为是否符合犯罪客观要件,既要做形式符合判断,也要做实质符合判断。前者按照社会公众接受或通常理解的字面含义来解释客观要件的范围,从而坚守罪刑法定原则的形式侧面要求;后者以法益观念为标准,把不侵害法益或者虽侵害法益但不值得刑罚处罚的行为,排除在刑事违法之外,从而坚守罪刑法定原则的实质侧面要求。对犯罪客观要件符合性进行判断必须先做形式符合判断,后做实质符合判断。这样的顺序符合评价规则,能规范入罪判断的思维路径,防止罪刑擅断。犯罪客观要件形式符合与实质符合判断的结论最终是统一的。 The assessment of the actus reus of a crime constitutes both formal and substantive accordance assessment. The former is an assessment on whether a conduct falls within the public＇ s acceptance or the common literal meaning of the definition of an actus reus of a crime. This is to adhere to the formal aspect of the principal of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. The latter focuses on the mischief of a conduct, and prevents the punishment of a conduct which has no mischief or a mischievous conduct which does not deserve to be punished; so that to comply with the substantive aspect of the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. The formal accordance needs to be assessed first, followed by the substantive accordance assessment. The order for the two assessments accord with the rule of assessment, which also can standardize the thinking pathway when assessing a crime to prevent making arbitrary decisions on crime and punishment. The results of both formal and substantive accordance assessment should be consistent.

关 键 词： 犯罪客观要件 形式符合判断 实质符合判断 结论统一