作　　者： (周明）;

机构地区： 兰州大学管理学院、中亚研究所,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处： 《社会科学》 2017年第9期29-41,共13页

摘　　要： 当前的恐怖主义展示出前所未有的国际化特征,具有较强的国际动员能力。然而,同一类型的恐怖组织的国际动员能力往往存在明显差异,如"基地"组织和"伊斯兰国"之间就是如此。从身份建构的角度对此予以分析,可以发现不同恐怖组织的组织属性对其国际动员能力能够产生明显影响。在同类恐怖组织中,那些群体实体性程度更高,即具有明确的群体界线、一致的成员标准、严格共享的战略目标和更为独特群体特征的恐怖组织,往往拥有更大的国际动员能力。相对于"基地","伊斯兰国"的群体实体性程度更高,故其国际动员能力更强。然而,群体实体性特征只能影响恐怖组织的动员能力,而对恐怖组织的整体发展能力和存续前景的影响是不确定的,因为后者受到如外部打击等其他一系列因素的影响。 At present, the internationalization degree of international terrorism was unprecedented in terrorism history, and these international groups also have unprecedented international mobilization capacity. But there is a puzzle in these phenomena, why different terrorism groups belong to same type terrorism have different international mobilization capability, such as Al-Qaeda and Islamic State. This paper tries to answer this puzzle and argues that the international mobilization capability of terrorism groups influenced by their group entitativity. With regard to group entitativity, naming whether the group has clear group boundary, whether it has consistent member inclusion standard, whether it has strict and shared strategic aims, whether it has distinctive group characters, and so on. When different terrorism groups belong to the same kind of terrorism, these terrorism groups which have higher group entitativity also have stronger international mobilization capacity. Comparing to AI-Qaeda, Islamic State has higher group entitativity, so the latter has stronger international mobilization capacity. Of course, although the group entitativity of terrorism group heavily impacts their mobilization capacity, it can＇t determine the development trends and survival prospects of terrorism groups, because these trends and prospects influenced by a lot of exogenous factors, such as external attacks, etc.

关 键 词： 基地 组织 伊斯兰国 本体 不 安全 群体实体性 国际动员能力