作 者: (谢玲);
机构地区: 中国人民公安大学,北京100038 重庆市消防总队,重庆401121
出 处: 《武警学院学报》 2017年第8期72-76,共5页
摘 要: 火灾事故发生后,负有监管职责的消防监督人员应否承担刑事责任不止是简单照搬《刑法》第397条规定,在个案中,围绕如何甄别监督层级、监督行为与危害结果之间有无因果关联、选择罪名和划定追责范围等问题,法检部门与消防部门往往存在激烈争议。监督过失学说正是为消除纷争而形成的规范《刑法》的研判工具。监督过失理论强调监督人负有对被监督人过失行为的注意义务,配之于一般过失成立条件,还能找准适用《刑法》第397条的基础,系统增强消防监督人员的责任与风险意识。 When the fire accident happens,whether the fire supervision personnel should undertake criminal liability or not is more than a simple application of the provision of article 397 of the Criminal Law. In specific cases,the procrastinates and the courts often argue with each other on how to identify supervision level and whether or not causal relationship between supervision behavior and harmful result exists,what charges to file and how to determine the scope of liability. The theory of supervision negligence is put forward to eliminate these disputes and becomes a means to standardize the application of the Criminal Law. Only by combining supervision negligence theory emphasizing the supervisor's duty to pay attention to the negligence of the supervised with conditions of negligence,can article 397 of the Criminal Law be accurately applied and the fire supervision personnel's consciousness of responsibility and risk be enhanced.