作　　者： (沈开举）; (邢昕）;

机构地区： 郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处： 《行政法学研究》 2017年第5期39-51,共13页

摘　　要： 2017年6月27日,全国人大常委会对《行政诉讼法》作出修改,正式确立检察机关提起行政公益诉讼制度。总结试点经验、细化配套制度成为新法修改后行政公益诉讼制度深化的重要任务。通过试点两年来13个试点地区检察机关提起公益诉讼的实证研究发现:行政公益诉讼案件量占同一时期总案件量的96.9%,其中办理诉前程序案件占行政公益诉讼总案件量的77.1%,诉前程序成功率为75.4%。行政公益诉讼诉前程序实际上是一个连接检察机关与行政机关、融合外部监督与自我纠错的复合型模式。对于诉前程序的深化应当从其法律性质和实施效果两方面综合考量,可从明确履行标准、延长回复时间等角度完善"诉前程序+提起诉讼"的检察机关提起行政公益诉讼双轨模式,并在贯彻落实新《行政诉讼法》的基础上从短期路径和长期路径角度完善行政公益诉讼制度。 On June 27th, 2017, the Standing Committee of National People＇s Congress modified the administrative litigation law, formally establishing the system of procuratorial organ initiating an administrative public interest litigation. The significant task of deepening the modified system of administrative public interest litigation is to conclude pilot experience and specify supporting system. According to the experience of the two-year-long procuratorial organ initiating an administrative public interest litigation in thirteen pilot areas, administrative public interest litigation accounts for 96.9% of the total synchronous cases, 77.1% of which are pre-trial procedure cases. The success rate of pre-trial procedure is 75.4%. Pre- trial procedure of administrative public interest litigation is actually a compound pattern of connecting procuratorial organs and administrative organs, integrating external supervision and self-correction. Deepening the pre-trial procedure should take into account both the legal nature and implementation effect. The double-track mode of ＂pre-trial procedure and initiating a litigation＂ of procuratorial organ initiating an administrative public interest litigation can be improved from the aspects of identifying performance criteria and prolonging reply time. On the basis of implementing new administrative litigation law, the system of administrative public interest litigation should be improved from both short-time and long-time ways.

关 键 词： 行政公益诉讼 诉前程序 检察建议