作　　者： (梁君瑜）;

机构地区： 武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处： 《行政法学研究》 2017年第5期30-38,共9页

摘　　要： 新《行政诉讼法》第26条第2款确立了复议机关作共同被告的制度。然而,从实施现状看,由于该制度在共同被告间举证责任之分配、原告不服一并裁判时被上诉人之确定方面尚缺乏完善的操作规则,这给司法实践带来了困难,故对操作规则的完善刻不容缓。完善操作规则乃是回应当下的司法实践所需,这无可厚非且实属必要。但从长远来看,复议机关作共同被告的制度因背离处分权主义的诉讼法理与"先取证,后裁决"的行政程序法原则,并可能助长复议机关不作为或不予受理复议申请的投机倾向,故其发展前景不容乐观,应逐渐退出历史的舞台。 Item 2 of article 26 of the new Administrative Litigation Law identifies that agency of administrative reconsideration should serve as joint defendants. However, according to the implementation, this system lacks operation rules on responsibility assignment between joint defendants and plaintiff not obeying the judgement, which brings difficulties to judicial practice, indicating an urgent perfection of operation rules. The perfection of operation rules is a reaction to the need of judicial practice, which is unblamable and indeed necessary. However, from a long term perspective, administrative reconsideration serving as joint defendants deviates from the litigant theory of dispositionsmaxime and the principle of administrative procedure law of ＂obtaining evidence first and then adjudicating＂. Besides, it may encourage the tendency of opportunism of agency of administrative reconsideration. Therefore, agency of administrative reconsideration serving as joint defendants has no bright future and it should be gradually eliminated.

关 键 词： 复议机关 共同被告 特殊共同诉讼 原处分主义 前景分析