作　　者： (王佳）;

机构地区： 烟台大学法学院

出　　处： 《赤峰学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2017年第8期75-77,共3页

摘　　要： 严格来说,赞同文学抄袭问题的司法解决并不意味着完全认同现行司法实践的所有做法,我国司法实践中并没有专门针对文学作品抄袭的相应的解决方案,且现行的有关文学抄袭问题的司法解决与现行司法实践存在隔阂。当前需对抄袭进行具体的司法认定,并将其与作品独创性结合以便量化分析著作权侵权中的具体标准,继而从文学观念的转变入手来探究文学艺术作品抄袭之争的本质。 Strictly speaking, the judicial solution to the plagiarism of literature does not mean that all the practices of the current judicial practice are fully recognized. In our judicial practice, there is no specific solution to the plagiarism of literary works, and the current judicial To solve the existing judicial practice there is a gap. At present, it is necessary to carry out specific judicial identification of plagiarism and combine it with the originality of the works in order to quantify the specific standards in copyright infringement, and then to explore the essence of the struggle of literary and artistic works from the change of literary concept.

关 键 词： 独创性 抄袭 文学观念